Andrei Mlendea vs Marius Copil Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L W
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Mlendea 1 - 2 Copil
They have played 7 sets in total, with Mlendea winning 2 and Copil winning 5. The last match between Mlendea and Copil was at the Romania F1, 04-05-2009, Semifinals, Clay with Andrei Mlendea getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrei Mlendea | 1 |
| Marius Copil | 2 |
Romania F1(04-05-2009)
3
6
7
5
6
2
| Mlendea | Stats | Copil |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 706 |
| 404 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 40 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 8 |
| 62% (227-142) | Career Total W/L | 54% (508-429) |
| $660 | Career Prize Money | $1,305,320 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(5) | |||||
| w/o | |||||
| 6-1 1-0 ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 26 | Games Won | 33 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrei Mlendea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Teodor-Dacian Craciun
Player
Andrei Mlendea
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
62%
(
18 of
29)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrei Mlendea
Player
Razvan Sabau
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (227/142) | Win/Loss | 54% (508/429) |
| 61% (484/309) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1182/1033) |
| 55% (3864/3144) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11371/10901) |
| 67% (18/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (117/117) |
| 62% (208/128) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) |
| 17% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (196/116) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (44/30) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
| 19 | Aces Total | 6741 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2098 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:55 |
| 454.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 537.36 |
| 59% (190/322) | 1st Serve % | 59% (30669/52322) |
| 72% (136/190) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (23337/30669) |
| 43% (57/132) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (11393/21653) |
| 36% (10/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1431/3829) |
| 36% (126/350) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18063/52250) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 37% (17/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (95/91) |
| 44% (8/10) | Challenger W/L | 55% (250/201) |
| 63% (218/129) | Futures W/L | 63% (98/58) |
| 63% (219/346) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (492/897) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 56% (33/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (238/454) |
| 52% (39/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (162/316) |
| 91% (220/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (511/424) |
| 8% (220/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (511/87) |
| 17% (148/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (426/81) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
